“Assigned To” and the Residency Test for PR Status

 

As previously discussed on this blog, one of the ways to satisfy the residency obligation of maintaining permanent residency is to be employed outside of Canada on a full-time basis by a Canadian business or in the federal public administration or the public service of a province.

A thorny issue that has arisen in the context of determining whether someone meets this requirement is whether an employee had been “assigned” to an overseas affiliate of a Canadian business, and whether it was necessary for there to actually be an “assignment” from the Canadian business.

In Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Jiang, 2011 FC 349, the Federal Court addressed this issue.

At issue before the Court was whether the Immigration Appeal Division had erred in determining that neither the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act or the Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations required that an assignment of a foreign employee must be effected from Canada.  In the Jiang case, a Canadian permanent resident living in China had been hired by a Canadian business while she was in China.

The relevant section of the Regulations reads:

Employment outside Canada

(3) For the purposes of subparagraphs 28(2)(a)(iii) and (iv) of the Act, the expression “employed on a full-time basis by a Canadian business or in the public service of Canada or of a province” means, in relation to a permanent resident, that the permanent resident is an employee of, or under contract to provide services to, a Canadian business or the public service of Canada or of a province, and is assigned on a full-time basis as a term of the employment or contract to

(a) a position outside Canada;

(b) an affiliated enterprise outside Canada; or

(c) a client of the Canadian business or the public service outside Canada.

The Federal Court ultimately disagreed with the Immigration Appeal Division, and ruled that the word “assigned” in subsection 61(3) means that an individual occupying a position outside Canada on a temporary basis.  It also requires that the individual be likely to return to Canada once the assignment is completed.

The issue of what constitutes employment on a full time basis abroad is one that is frequently litigated before the Immigration Appeal Division, and this case goes a long way towards resolving uncertainties in the law regarding the issue.

Maintaining Permanent Residency Status While Working Abroad

In today’s increasingly mobile world, many immigrants are having trouble meeting the residency requirements to maintain permanent residency.  In what is known as the “2 year out of 5 rule”, permanent residences are required to spend 2 years out of every 5 living in Canada in order to maintain their status. However, there are important exceptions to this rule.  Section 28 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act provides that:

Residency obligation

28. (1) A permanent resident must comply with a residency obligation with respect to every five-year period.

Application

(2) The following provisions govern the residency obligation under subsection (1):

(a) a permanent resident complies with the residency obligation with respect to a five-year period if, on each of a total of at least 730 days in that five-year period, they are

(i) physically present in Canada,

(ii) outside Canada accompanying a Canadian citizen who is their spouse or common-law partner or, in the case of a child, their parent,

(iii) outside Canada employed on a full-time basis by a Canadian business or in the federal public administration or the public service of a province,

(iv) outside Canada accompanying a permanent resident who is their spouse or common-law partner or, in the case of a child, their parent and who is employed on a full-time basis by a Canadian business or in the federal public administration or the public service of a province, or

(v) referred to in regulations providing for other means of compliance;

(b) it is sufficient for a permanent resident to demonstrate at examination

(i) if they have been a permanent resident for less than five years, that they will be able to meet the residency obligation in respect of the five-year period immediately after they became a permanent resident;

(ii) if they have been a permanent resident for five years or more, that they have met the residency obligation in respect of the five-year period immediately before the examination; and

(c) a determination by an officer that humanitarian and compassionate considerations relating to a permanent resident, taking into account the best interests of a child directly affected by the determination, justify the retention of permanent resident status overcomes any breach of the residency obligation prior to the determination.

In today’s post I want to discuss what is meant by a “Canadian business”.  Time spent abroad working for a Canadian company counts as time spent in Canada.  The ability to maintain permanent residency while working for a Canadian business abroad has led much confusion, as well as to an explosion of fake businesses. Indeed, the difficulty in determining whether someone has met this requirement is likely one of the main reasons for the dramatic increase in the processing times of renewal permanent residency cards.

The Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations describe a “Canadian business” as being:

61. (1) Subject to subsection (2), for the purposes of subparagraphs 28(2)(a)(iii) and (iv) of the Act and of this section, a Canadian business is

(a) a corporation that is incorporated under the laws of Canada or of a province and that has an ongoing operation in Canada; (author’s note: this includes not-for-profits)

(b) an enterprise, other than a corporation described in paragraph (a), that has an ongoing operation in Canada and

(i) that is capable of generating revenue and is carried on in anticipation of profit, and

(ii) in which a majority of voting or ownership interests is held by Canadian citizens, permanent residents, or Canadian businesses as defined in this subsection; or

(c) an organization or enterprise created under the laws of Canada or a province.

Exclusion

(2) For greater certainty, a Canadian business does not include a business that serves primarily to allow a permanent resident to comply with their residency obligation while residing outside Canada

In order to rely on this exception, an individual will likely have to produce numerous documents in order to determine whether they are legitimately working abroad for a Canadian business. These documents include the Articles of Incorporation, the Corporate Annual Reports, the Corporation Notice of Assessment, other financial statements, the employee’s employment contract, and a job description.

Given the extremely complicated nature of this exception, it is advised that people seek representation to ensure that all the documents are there. The risk in not doing so is delays in processing, which can greatly hinder the ability to travel.

CIC Hires More PR Card Renewal Processing Staff

I have commented extensively upon the increased wait time in processing permanent residency card renewals.  I have noted that the dramatic increase from an average of 40 days to the current 191 cannot be the result of an increase in applicants, because the number of applicants is actually decreasing.  I hypothesized that the actual reason was likely due to either an increase in the complexity of files, or staffing issues.

Today the Cape Breton Post is suggesting that the issue is indeed staffing.

Apparently, layoff notices were issued to 84 temporary employees and 63 casual workers (for a total of 147 employees) at CIC Sydney, which is where citizenship applications and PR Card renewals are processed.

The department, however, announced yesterday that up to 160 new positions will be filled this month.

PR Card Renewal Wait Times Continue to Increase, plus: Use of a Representative : 說不出代辦名字易惹官質疑

Less than three weeks ago I commented on the increased delay in processing PR Card Renewals.  The processing time had gone from roughly 40 days in January, to 80 days in April, to 171 days on July 16th.

The situation is not improving. According to CIC’s website, the current wait time is 193 days.  CIC is currently processing applications that were received on February 8, 2010.

In Ming Pao I suggested that this might be due to an increase in the amount of people applying for PR Card renewals, as well as staffing changes at CIC.

Using data recently provided by CIC, I have come to the conclusion that the first explanation might not be true.

Continue reading

Wait Times for PR Card Renewal Dramatically Increase : 申請人及律師炮轟 中國新移民遭歧視

 

The processing time for PR Card renewals has ballooned from roughly 42 days to 171.  There are several reasons for this, including personnel reductions at CPC Sydney, a higher than expected number of permanent residences wanting to renew their card instead of seeking citizenship, and increased complexity of some of the files.

I was quoted on this matter in yesterday’s Ming Pao:

不增人手 問題更惡化

移民律師辛湉王(Steven Meurrens)則說,移民部完全錯估了楓葉卡第一次5年到期後、仍未累積夠居住時間而須再更換楓葉卡的人數。他指出,2002年楓葉卡推出5年 後,2007年開始接受換卡,今年才是接受換卡的第3年,人數已多到令現有人力無法負擔的程度,如果再不加人手,問題只會更惡化。

辛湉王 說,楓葉卡更換的過程比想像中複雜,例如被派到國外加拿大公司工作的永久居民,必須盡可能繳足所有證明在當地居住的文件,由於之前有個案造假,移民部對派 駐海外工作永久居民的楓葉卡更換申請,調查特嚴格,如此均拖慢所有的申請進度。

Yesterday I also recommended to an individual who is a frequent flyer and whose PR card was set to expire in February that he start the application process now. He replied that this would cause great difficulties because he would have to turn in his existing, still valid, PR Card.

This is not the case.

From Immigration Canada’s website:

If you are applying to renew your present card and:

  • your card has expired, you should return it with the completed application for a new card or
  • your card is still valid, you may hold on to it and return it to a CIC officer when you pick-up your new card at a local CIC office.

If you are applying to replace your damaged card, you should return your card with your application.

Individuals who are deciding whether or not to apply early to renew their PR Card should thus not worry about having to turn their existing card in.